亂講日誌

GROSS. MAX. 

by woodland, Wu

declares historical heritage to be “architectural necrophilia”, 
complaining that “ecological megalomania is “regressive striving for a rural idyll” 
and demands a “Pandora's box full of metropolitan sensual delight”.
“Why suffocate in an overdoes of chlorophyll if we can boost our level of adrenaline instead？ 

Parks should not spread over cities like a green stain; 
on the contrary, they should be confined to special designated sanctuaries; 
the park as a hunting-ground for the contemporary citizens.” 
The city is seen as an event, 
the park as a cultural and traditional domain for hedonistic pleasure. 
And this is not all about horticultural extravaganzas but about new approaches defining public spaces. 

“We like the simple notion of ‘a change of scenery’; 
it reveals a basic desire for 
exotic holiday destination, compulsive adultery 
and most important it provides the rationale behind most landscape projects.”
--
吳樹陸

抱守歷史遺產 根本就是建築的戀屍癖
生態上的妄想自大 是一股沉湎於鄉村田園的反動勢力
我們要的是 充滿都會肉慾感官悅樂的 潘朵拉的盒子
如果能夠激起腎上腺素 爲何還要窒悶在過度瀰漫的葉綠素中

公園不該像是綠色污漬般的散落在城市中
它們該是 某些被特別限定的聖所
城市是一場事件
公園則是文化傳統上的 享樂主義歡場
它不該只是一場園藝盛會 而該是一種界定公共空間的新途徑

我們的提議其實很簡單 —— 改頭換面 a change of scenery 不一樣的景色

這 揭示了那種 對於
異國假日 衝動出軌 的根本嚮往
更重要的 這爲大部分的地景設計 提供了可資依憑的理論基礎